This article discusses only personal opinions and represents no advice on how to invest in stocks.

1. Safe Reserves in
   a) Gold or similar assets
   b) Stable ETF-s (MSCI-World, Dividend-Aristocrats, Emerging Markets)
2. No Emotions
   A) Resist FOMO, don’t be a sheep, don’t follow short-term trends |
   B) Instead keep investing | buy more and hodl
   C) Never buy on an All-Time-High (Buy-Low-Sell-High)
3. Don’t sell because stocks fall, rather buy more (except the company is problematic)
   When the whole market falls, then buy more (not all stocks rise after they have fallen, but when many fall it is an option to buy your candidates)
4. Mostly buy what you want to hold
5. a) Safe-Reserve for sudden expenses
   b) 80% potential 10-baggers (Hodl – Tech-stocks and plays, goal is outperformance)
   c) 10% Crazy Money (Potential 100-Bagger)
   d) 10% Coins
6. Be patient – Wait for the fall
7. Invest Everything you have
8. Distribute (if you always bet on the best team, you will win often, but the win is also included in the possible gain)
9. Find small companies
10. Nobody can know who will built the best cellphone in 10 years

The known things won’t work.
It does pay off to have your own opinion.

Investments

• Facebook (Emmigration into second reality)
• Twitter (The News Machine of Tomorrow)
• Walt Disney (The Content-Universe), Investing in the Dream-Factory
• Apple (The stock one always should hold?)

• Alternative Energies
  • Orsted (Wind Energy)
  • Varta bedeutet warten (The future runs on batteries)
  • BYD – (Battery and Alternative Cars)

Artificial Intelligence

Baidu (Rejuvenation of China)

Delivery Hero (one deliver service has to win the future, delivery is the future)

Watchlist

Siemens Fall (nachkaufen?), wird niemals ein outperformer

10 Bagger

• Biontech
• Spotify (?)
• Square/Block

Dividend Stocks

• (Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjPCeD1MlHI)
  – Enterprise Product Partners
• Pen and Parker
• Sabra (Altersheim)
• Medical Property Trust
• Verizon Communications

Potential Investments

• Pinterest – Everything grows (12.04.22)

Necessary memes for introducing possible worlds

Introductions

Philosophytube

Intro by Victor Gijsbers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYRLe5t0Fng

Notes:

From the Comment-Section: ‘Possible Worlds are the Philosophers Paradise’

• ‘Originally Set-Theory: as the Mathematicians Paradise (Hilbert?)’
• ‘The Plurality of Worlds: Everything could have been’
• ‘We cannot travel to possible worlds’, [they are islands of the mind]

Gordon Petitt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s796Zj7DhNY

• ‘Lewis’ theory for set-theory – avoiding Plato’s abstracta’
• ‘class nominalist’
• “p is the set of all ‘p-ish worlds'”
• “necessary propositions include all PWs members”
• Makes formal talk about PW possible
• “Concepts of modality, properties, and propositions are reduced to set theory and concrete”
• “The term ‘actual’ is an indexical (like ‘now’ or ‘here’) and refers to different worlds according to its use.”
• “There is favored status for our actual world. Thus people in other PWs use ‘actual’ to refer to a different world than we do.”
• ‘PW diverge over branch’
• “Plantinga” ‘Modality cannot be reduced to sets of concrete things’

Questions

How to deal with formulations like “Everything is Possible”

Other Continental Philosophers Struggling:

Comment: It sooths my mind that not only me had problems understanding this.

Discussions

Stanford Dictionary: “The chief question Lewis faces in this regard is whether there are enough worlds to do the job. The truth condition (20) for the intuitively true (16) says that there exists a possible world in which a counterpart of Algol is no one’s pet. By virtue of what in Lewis’s theory does such a world exist? The ideal answer for Lewis would be that some principle in his theory guarantees a plenitude of worlds, a maximally abundant array of worlds that leaves “no gaps in logical space; no vacancies where a world might have been, but isn’t” (Lewis 1986, 86). From this it would follow that the worlds required by the concretist truth condition for any intuitive modal truth exist. Toward this end, Lewis initially considers the evocative principle:”

Reflections by Me

Modal realism is very different. It means that possible worlds are real so that they are part of the logical space. Basically they idea is that when we think: every statement is the opposite of a multitude of logically possible worlds. To say it more lyrically I believe that we test in our mind what is impossible with fantasies that we then meditate about as possibilities which we then convert into actions. From the impossible to the possible to the actual

• Islands of possibilities in our mind, logical dreams of other worlds
• We could have lived, fantasies, novels, dreams, movies, plays
• Super-powers in these intimate possible realities
• Impossible worlds (non-stop none-sense)
• Our mind moves: from the impossible to the possible to the actual
• Thinking means to go from the Impossible to the Possible to the Actual

• A Theory is a commitment
• A belief is a commitment
• A Commitment is an Action
• An Action means to act upon something that we perceive as mind-external reality

Is a Theory a necessary part of seeing?
Is a Theory an action?

Another Intro

1. How to live a meaningful life?
2. What is Death?
3. Will mankind survive itself?
4. Will we radically transform?
5. Is the Singularity near?
6. What is my place in the future of technology?
7. Are there objective Ethics?
8. Does God exist and care?
9. Who am I?
10. Where am I when I am.

Ich habe mal aus Rezos Videos seine angeblich verständlichere Sprache rausgeschrieben. Er verlangt ja häufiger, dass Politikern klarer reden:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ya7pEDndgE

Also es geht Rezo darum, das absolut “shady level” der “easy Korruption” “ever” aufzuspüren. Also “buckle up”, es wird “crazy”. Die meisten “Parts” sind über seine “Favourite-Möglichkeiten” wie “tricky” “Guys” ihre “lokale Lieblingspartei supporten”. “Komm mon” , dieser “Dude” hier, “son Richkid” ist “cool mit Hitler” und hat natürlich eine “shady Spendenaffären”. Das ist auf deutsch gesagt “full on Breaking Bad Shit”. Aber sein “Move” ist auch so “super-easy”. “What the fuck” this bullshit”! Dabei sind diese “easy Wege” keine “random Beispiele”. Es geht generell um “easy tricks” wie Politiker ihre “payroll” auf “100k” pro Jahr pimpen. “Maybe” sind die Volksvertreter einfach nur dumm, denn, “I shit you not”, “eine clean ausgeführte Korruption nachzuweisen” geht nicht. Deswegen “shout out” an die guten Journalisten weil das gibt es “fucking-mal” zu oft. “Obviously” sind in der Politik zu viele “professionelle Beeinflusser” am Werk (womöglich meint Rezo hier das Englische Wort ‘Influencer’). “Obviously” ist es notwendig, dass dieser “abuse gesneaked” wird, denn “basically” gesagt, “imagine” deren “dermaßen abgefucktes Weltbild”.

Noch eine Frage: Wer “am meisten Shit abzieht”? “Komm mon” unsere “fucking Volksvertreter”, die für ihre “Deals eincashen”, die sind doch alle “ganz obviously” “broken”. Das “muss gefixed werden”. “Peace”.